WESTMINSTER must tighten up its handling of bullying and sexual harassment complaints – and reveal sanctions laid down, a review has found.
An 18-month review into processes at the House of Commons and the House of Lords says authorities should speed up probes and increase the support for complainants.
Parliament’s Independent Complaints and Grievance Scheme (ICGS) was introduced in 2018 to tackle forms of harassment. It comprises a helpline, and an independent investigation service for reports against staff of either House, MPs, or MPs’ staff.
More than 50 people who had used the ICGS gave confidential contributions to the review by HR director Alison Stanley, with more than 700 survey responses also received.
Stanley's review found its operation and processes have become "over complex and there is a perception amongst the Parliamentary community that it is a stressful, isolated and lengthy process".
Some groups, Stanley found, "are less likely to use the scheme for confidential support and advice or to make a claim" and many of those involved in investigations were critical about the process.
READ MORE: Priti Patel backed by Boris Johnson after ‘bullying’ claims
From June 2019-July 2020 only 70% of cases were concluded within 120 working days, something that affected the "mental wellbeing" of some of those involved, with stress "often exacerbated by a lack of regular updates from an investigator as to progress and the lack of clarity on the next steps in the process".
This should now be simplified and speeded up, Stanley concluded, with the phrase "case to answer" nolonger used at initial complaints assessments because respondents felt they had been treated as "guilty" from the start.
She said: "There is evidence that completion times of recently opened cases is much improved with the 14 cases opened since April 2020 all being closed within 90 days at an average of 53 working days although this is admittedly a small data set as yet."
And she said there is currently a "perception" amongst some staff "that those who have been found to have bullied or harassed another or sexually assaulted them are not being held to account".
The review said this is partly due to confidentiality constraints.
Kathryn Stone, Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards, said she is unable to publish information about individual ICGS complaints and changes to this would "have a positive impact on confidence in the Scheme".
READ MORE: Conservative ‘corruption’ puts UK politics at major turning point, SNP MP says
She stated: "I hope that the House will soon be invited to approve a new range of sanctions, which will result in a broader range of responses to misconduct by MPs."
Ed Ollard, clerk of the parliaments, commented: “Bullying and harassment have no place in Parliament."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel